Technical note / thermal optimization workflow
Get the rest of your day back.
1. From messy CAD to thermal insight.
Fermi keeps the setup path short so engineers can spend more time testing assumptions and improving the design.
Submit geometry
Automate cleanup
2. Simulation setup is consuming the engineering day.
Engineers spend too much time moving between CAD, meshing tools, solver settings, scripts, screenshots, and status windows.
By the time the model finally runs, there is less time left for the part that matters: deciding what to simulate, what the results mean, and what to do next.
4. Fermi competes with the ways simulation gets avoided.
| Default path | What it costs |
|---|---|
| External consultancies | Outsources the learning loop your engineering org should own. |
| Waiting to hire more specialists | Slows the team down while the talent pool remains limited. |
| Manual CAD-mesh-solver workflows | Burns senior engineering time on operational work instead of thermal reasoning. |
| Skipping simulation | Feels faster until failures, delayed launches, and expensive physical iteration arrive. |
Fermi is the internal workflow layer for teams that want simulation to become a repeatable design habit.
Appendix A. Pilot intake
The recommended pilot starts with an NDA-gated use-case submission, optionally including geometry or assembly files. After the case is scoped, the team books a working session to define inputs, constraints, and success criteria.
Open pilot intake